Peace between Azerbaijan and Armenia is feasible: Armenian PM

“Armenia and Azerbaijan were able to agree on the basic principles of the peace treaty,” Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He said that consensus has been reached on the main issues, Azernews reports.

According to Pashinyan, the agreement on the main principles concerning peace was reached as a result of the meetings held in Brussels.


“This happened through the mediation of the head of the Council of the European Union Charles Michel”.


It should be noted that Hikmet Hajiyev, the Assistant to the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan and head of the Foreign Policy Department of the Presidential Administration also spoke about the peace program in the region.

“There is an understanding between Armenia and Azerbaijan that demarcation should take place on the maps of the USSR General Staff of 1974-1990, there is also an understanding that Armenia and Azerbaijan should not have territorial claims to each other.


In an address to journalists in Brussels, the Azerbaijani official said, “Some member states of the European Union (EU), such as France, have started a programme of militarisation of Armenia”.


The official said that these militarisation programmes do not correspond to reality.


“Firstly, we don’t consider any militarisation programme is useful. Armenia does not need a militarisation programme. Armenia needs a peace programme,” he said.


“We believe that this is a historical opportunity and a historical impetus, and the relevant European institutions should be part of the solution, not the problem, to promote a peace agenda in a region of social crisis.


According to the presidential aide, the issue of peace and normalisation of bilateral relations between Baku and Yerevan is on Azerbaijan’s agenda: “The illegal regime of Armenia has been disarmed and removed from the territory of Azerbaijan. This means that there are no obstacles to the conclusion of a peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan.


The US and France have been trying for two months to lobby for the adoption of an anti-Azerbaijani resolution in the UN Security Council, but have been unable to promote it.


It should be recalled that after Azerbaijan’s local anti-terrorist activities in Karabagh, an emergency session of the UN Security Council was convened twice at the initiative of Armenia, but both times these sessions ended in nothing. Yesterday, the ICJ’s refusal of the Armenian claims of removing Azerbaijan’s military and security organisations from Karabagh and ICRC’s operation in Karabagh unnecessary is proof of Azerbaijan’s abiding by international law as well as standing for peace in the South Caucasus.


No news on the next target of  the conflict:  Zangezur Corridor

While  peace between Azerbaijan and Armenia would be a very welcome development, aiding economic progress in both countries, and Turkey’s underdeveloped North East region, there is no new news on the current focus of the enteral friction, namely the Zangezur Corridor.

According to a Foreign Affairs analysis posted 2 weeks ago,  Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev may now have his sights set on seizing an extraterritorial corridor through Armenia’s southernmost Syunik province, which he has branded as the so-called Zangezur corridor. This extraterritorial corridor would link mainland Azerbaijan with the small Azerbaijani exclave of Nakhichevan, to Armenia’s west, which borders Turkey and Iran.

An extraterritorial corridor cutting through Armenian territory would, by definition, be militarized: The Armenian government continues to object to the plan as breaching its territorial sovereignty. It also fears the corridor becoming a haven for illicit activity and trade.

The Armenian government has instead offered a vision of broader regional connectivity: opening de jure borders and rebuilding Soviet-era cross-border roads and railways, all operating within the framework of established international law and respecting the full sovereignty of the countries through which they pass. Indeed, opening borders would yield immediate economic dividends to all countries in the South Caucasus.


Follow our  English language YouTube videos  @ REAL TURKEY:

And content at Twitter: @AtillaEng

Facebook:  Real Turkey Channel:






Published By: Atilla Yeşilada

GlobalSource Partners’ Turkey Country Analyst Atilla Yesilada is the country’s leading political analyst and commentator. He is known throughout the finance and political science world for his thorough and outspoken coverage of Turkey’s political and financial developments. In addition to his extensive writing schedule, he is often called upon to provide his political expertise on major radio and television channels. Based in Istanbul, Atilla is co-founder of the information platform Istanbul Analytics and is one of GlobalSource’s local partners in Turkey. In addition to his consulting work and speaking engagements throughout the US, Europe and the Middle East, he writes regular columns for Turkey’s leading financial websites VATAN and and has contributed to the financial daily Referans and the liberal daily Radikal.