Skip to content

Twin Incidents in Mersin and Diyarbakır Raise Fears of Renewed Political Provocation in Türkiye

kobane olaylari

Summary:


Türkiye was shaken on the same evening by two separate security incidents in Mersin and Diyarbakır, prompting concerns among politicians and commentators about deliberate provocation and a possible escalation reminiscent of the violent “6–8 October” events of 2014. While authorities stressed that investigations are ongoing and damage was limited, pro-government commentators warned that the country could be drifting toward a dangerous political flashpoint if tensions are not contained.

Risks of a new Kurdish protest wave rose, after pro-Kurdish DEM Party co-chair Mr Tuncer Bakirhan warned the government that the “Kurdish heart is bleeding” as a result of Syrian Kurds’ humiliating defeat at the hands of Syrian National Army. He added that if Turks and Kurds are kin,  Turkey is obligated to look out for the safety and welfare of Syrian Kurds, too.

Two Incidents, One Evening

Türkiye is likely to debate for some time the significance of two serious incidents that unfolded almost simultaneously on Tuesday evening in different parts of the country.

In the Mediterranean province of Mersin, an unauthorized demonstration organized by the DEM Party in the Tarsus district ended in chaos when gunfire injured a Syrian national. At nearly the same time, an explosive device was thrown at the main building of the Diyarbakır Provincial Police Department, raising fresh security concerns in the predominantly Kurdish southeast.

The coincidence in timing led many political figures to describe the events as coordinated “provocations,” while some commentators went further, drawing parallels with one of the most traumatic episodes of political violence in recent Turkish history.

Unauthorized DEM Party March in Tarsus

According to a statement by the Mersin Governor’s Office, around 100 people gathered at approximately 7:00 p.m. for an unauthorized march organized by the DEM Party’s Tarsus district branch. Police intervened, and the demonstration was dispersed by around 8:20 p.m.

Shortly after the dispersal, a group involved in the demonstration reportedly entered the garden of a nearby residence. An argument broke out between the group and the homeowner. During the confrontation, the homeowner fired shots into the air.

One of the bullets struck a Syrian national, identified as B.A., who was standing on the balcony of the building. The injured individual, born in Aleppo in 2002, was taken to hospital. Authorities did not immediately provide details on the victim’s condition.

Officials emphasized that investigations into the incident are continuing and that all legal procedures are being followed.

Explosive Attack on Diyarbakır Police Building

Meanwhile, at around 8:15 p.m., two masked individuals threw a homemade explosive device at the road near the public entrance of the Diyarbakır Provincial Police Department’s main service building.

According to the Diyarbakır Governor’s Office, the explosive device did not cause any damage or injuries and was safely neutralized by security teams. A manhunt was launched to identify and apprehend the suspects.

In a written statement, the governor’s office said expert teams had determined that the device caused no material damage, adding that security forces were “meticulously continuing” efforts to identify and capture those responsible.

ANALYSIS | As the Syrian Map Shifts, Where Does Turkish Public Opinion Stand?

Political Reactions: “Provocation” Consensus

Politicians from across the political spectrum issued statements condemning both incidents. Lawmakers who commented publicly largely agreed on one point: the events bore the hallmarks of provocation at a time of heightened political tension.

However, while most political figures avoided drawing broader historical parallels, a sharper warning came from pro-government media circles.

“Pandora’s Box” and the Shadow of October 2014

Journalist Mehmet Çek, known for his proximity to President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s chief adviser Mehmet Uçum, explicitly linked the two incidents to the violent unrest of October 6–8, 2014.

Those events, commonly referred to as the “Kobani protests,” erupted across 35 provinces and 96 districts after the Islamic State intensified its assault on the Kurdish-majority Syrian town of Kobani. Demonstrations in Türkiye escalated into widespread violence, leaving 37 people dead and more than 700 injured, including hundreds of security personnel.

In the years that followed, sweeping legal cases were launched over the protests. A total of 108 defendants, including prominent politicians, were prosecuted, with heavy prison sentences handed down in several cases.

“How Long Will the State Watch?”

Commenting on Tuesday’s incidents, Çek suggested that the country was witnessing early warning signs of a similar trajectory.

Referring to the Mersin and Diyarbakır events, he asked rhetorically: “How much longer will the state simply watch?”

In a widely circulated post, Çek claimed that the atmosphere in parts of southeastern Türkiye resembled scenes from a “horror film,” alleging burning tires, overturned garbage bins, and armed militants patrolling streets in some districts. He accused the DEM Party of “stirring” tensions in a manner similar to 2014, while questioning the response of state authorities.

While these claims were not independently verified and were not echoed by official statements, the commentary drew significant attention and further fueled debate.

A Political Crossroads

The sharp rhetoric underscores a broader dilemma facing Türkiye’s political establishment. One path risks reopening deep political and social fractures that have remained sensitive since 2014. Another would require swift, coordinated action by political actors to de-escalate tensions and prevent isolated incidents from spiraling into broader unrest.

For now, authorities continue to frame both cases as isolated security incidents under investigation. Whether they remain so—or evolve into something more consequential—will depend largely on political restraint and the handling of the coming days.

PA Staff, Yeni Cag Gazette

PA Turkey intends to inform Turkey watchers with diverse views and opinions. Articles on our website may not necessarily represent the view of our editorial board or count as endorsement.

Follow our English YouTube channel (REAL TURKEY):
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKpFJB4GFiNkhmpVZQ_d9Rg

Twitter: @AtillaEng
Facebook: Real Turkey Channel: https://www.facebook.com/realturkeychannel/***

Related articles