Guldem Atabay:  Turkish economy until elections

AKP’s economic management will firmly stick to the path it calls the “New Economy Model” until the May 14 elections, adding to it enormous  sums of electoral spending and similar voter-pleasing measures, which are exclusively distortive. What will happen until the elections in 2023 will determine the priorities in the economy after the election, depending on who wins the power; or how it is shared between competing alliances. This will undoubtedly make 2023 a difficult year with high uncertainty, potentially exhibiting  Dr Jekyll and Hyde features pre- and post-election.

More than a year spent under the New Economy Model sheds lights on ​​what the government’s priorities will be until mid-May. If we take what they have done as a guarantee of what  they will do it, it is realistic for  AKP to  prioritize  growth in the January-May period. After the third quarter of 2022 growth lost momentum, but  as of December, it seems to pick up,  again, driven by domestic demand. As the global recession deepens, the way to achieve growth in the Turkish economy will be to stimulate domestic demand. After 4Q2022, when quarter-to-quarter growth will have  turned slightly negative, support to domestic demand through monetary and fiscal policy will most likely lead to an annualized growth of 4.5% in the period until the 2023 election.

 

It is debatable whether such  front-loaded growth focused on the minimum wage increase, weakening foreign demand and domestic demand will be a remedy for the stagnation observed in employment  in recent months.

 

The expansion we have seen in loans in the last weeks of 2022 will accelerate. While private banks continue to focus on consumer loans, public banks will start an offensive in corporate loans. The increase in public spending for various subsidized loan programs, as well as direct-to-voter porkbarreling will likely lead to a budget deficit of 4% and above by end-2023,  expressed as a share of GDP. We observe that the Treasury ended its relative 4Q2022 fiscal prudence,  initiating an expenditure wave since the beginning of January, as judged by the  decrease in its deposits held at the CBRT.

 

The primary policy objective remains to keep the TL steady as much as possible.  What everyone is wondering is whether there will be a new attack on TL as a result of steadily accumulated risks in all facets of the economy? Recall  that there is no portfolio inflows, no direct investment with the exception of foreign housing purchases, while  tourism revenues decrease through April-May, and swap/deposit type of “donations” from Erdogan’s friends are already mostly in the accounts. For the rest for 2023, the game plan is to cover potential current account financing shortfalls  with sovereign foreign borrowing at very high interest rates, and natural gas debt “deferrals” granted by Putin, which  can rise to more than 20-25 billion dollars.

 

From this point of view, it is possible to expect a new attack on the TL at any moment, which CBRT is trying to fend off  with new “regulations” adding  to  de facto capital controls regime prevailing in the financial markets.

 

Growth prioritization will stoke inflation and current account deficit

Acceleration in growth will undoubtedly have negative effects on inflation and current account deficit over this  period.

On the back of a positive base effect and the exchange rate stability, the expected decline in inflation will be limited by the strengthening  domestic demand. By May 14 election, April 2023  CPI inflation will have declined  to approximately 45%. While the decrease in energy prices in recent months and strength of  TL are  positive factors in terms of dis-inflation, wage increases announced at the end of December and the possibility of their repetition in April will undoubtedly keep price pressures alive. It is unrealistic to expect a meaningful decline in food inflation anyway. On the other hand, it is not possible for the “price freeze” campaigns on various products announced by the chain markets (after the draconian collusion penalties they received from the Competition Board) to be effective. It should not be forgotten that there is no  effort to fight inflation beyond the base year effect and inflation expectations are already out of control. A road accident in TL will directly and rapidly pass through to inflation.

 

In terms of balance of payments dynamics, a widening  in the current account deficit and steadily worsening financing quality until the election are reasonable scenarios. Against these threats,  net foreign exchange reserves of the central bank are at minus $44 billion, excluding swaps. Gross reserves of the central bank, which have been stuck at $128 billion for weeks and represent the ammo it has in its disposal to fend off attacks on the currency, will of course remain the focus of attention until the election. The magnitude of withdrawals from Currency Protected Deposits and whether these funds will be directed to foreign exchange demand, or consumption thanks to cheap loans, is also important to watch in terms assessing CBRT’s capacity to defend the exchange rate.

The  outlook is negative for the current account deficit. In the count-down  to elections, when growth is accelerates, exports will slow mainly due to modest foreign demand and partially because  of overvalued TL, while the rate of increase in imports will remain relatively strong. In addition to the pressure on imports of intermediate goods created by domestic demand on  the production side, gold imports  are expected to accelerate in an extremely negative real interest rate environment. Before the positive base effect in  energy prices is reflected through energy imports (usually with a 3 month delay due to prevalence of contract rather than spot buying), foreign trade deficit will increase in the January-April period, translating into a current account deficit of around 20 billion dollars in the first four months.

 

The current account deficit, which was around 1% of the GDP at the end of 2021, increased to 5% in 2022,  or approximately 48 billion dollars and is expected to continue at that level in the first quarter of 2023, will create a significant TL pressure that the government will try to shoulder until the elections. Around 50% of the financing came from net errors and omissions of unknown origin last year, and it is extremely doubtful whether such funding will continue until the 2023 election, creating significant vulnerabilities in exchange rate management.

At the end, the  AKP government is skating on thin ice  leading up to the elections, and if things do not go as expected;  i.e., if domestic investors start to turn to foreign currency again, Erdogan’s game plan will be shattered. Even if he averts a BoP crisis, Erdogan is handing down a creaky economic structure to the next administration after the election.

 

Follow our  English language YouTube videos  @ REAL TURKEY:   https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKpFJB4GFiNkhmpVZQ_d9Rg

And content at Twitter: @AtillaEng

Facebook:  Real Turkey Channel:   https://www.facebook.com/realturkeychannel/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Published By: Atilla Yeşilada

GlobalSource Partners’ Turkey Country Analyst Atilla Yesilada is the country’s leading political analyst and commentator. He is known throughout the finance and political science world for his thorough and outspoken coverage of Turkey’s political and financial developments. In addition to his extensive writing schedule, he is often called upon to provide his political expertise on major radio and television channels. Based in Istanbul, Atilla is co-founder of the information platform Istanbul Analytics and is one of GlobalSource’s local partners in Turkey. In addition to his consulting work and speaking engagements throughout the US, Europe and the Middle East, he writes regular columns for Turkey’s leading financial websites VATAN and www.paraanaliz.com and has contributed to the financial daily Referans and the liberal daily Radikal.