Turkey’s Health System in Crisis: AKP Insiders Admit “Collapse” Risks Under New Minister

Summary:

Internal assessments within Turkey’s ruling party indicate mounting concern over the country’s healthcare system, with senior figures privately conceding that service delivery, access, and public trust are deteriorating. According to party insiders, expectations that a ministerial change would stabilize the system have not been met, and healthcare has now become a politically “high-risk” issue for the government ahead of future elections.

Rare Internal Criticism from the Ruling Party

Turkey’s healthcare system—long portrayed by the government as one of its flagship reform successes—is now facing unusually blunt criticism from within the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) itself. Senior party figures have acknowledged in internal reports that structural problems in healthcare delivery have reached a point where they can no longer be concealed from the public.

According to these internal evaluations, problems ranging from appointment backlogs and staff shortages to breakdowns in communication between the Ministry of Health and citizens are fueling growing dissatisfaction. Party officials warn that the crisis is no longer merely administrative but is beginning to carry serious political consequences.

Several AKP insiders reportedly describe the situation as approaching a “collapse,” a striking admission from a party that has long used healthcare reform as a core element of its electoral appeal.

Expectations Dashed After Ministerial Change

One of the most sensitive points in internal discussions is the comparison between former Health Minister Fahrettin Koca and his successor Kemal Memişoğlu. Party officials say hopes that a leadership change would resolve mounting problems have largely been disappointed.

According to reporting by the daily Cumhuriyet, senior AKP figures argue that the system’s performance has worsened rather than improved under the new minister. One internal assessment quoted by the paper captures the frustration:

“He was brought in to fix the healthcare system, but the picture is even worse. Frankly, we find ourselves missing Fahrettin Koca.”

Criticism reportedly centers on appointment shortages, difficulties accessing basic services, staffing gaps, and what party insiders describe as weak administrative coordination. While the healthcare system itself was designed under AKP rule, responsibility for its current shortcomings is increasingly being directed personally at Memişoğlu.

Healthcare Becomes a Political Liability

Internal party reports now classify healthcare policy as a “high-risk” political issue—an extraordinary shift for a sector that once delivered consistent electoral gains. AKP officials reportedly frame the issue in starkly political terms.

“Citizens cannot access services,” one internal comment notes. “The political consequence is clear: we are losing votes.”

For years, healthcare reform served as one of the AKP’s strongest links to voters, particularly among lower- and middle-income households. Today, insiders warn that it has become one of the leading drivers of voter discontent, especially in urban areas where hospital overcrowding and appointment delays are most visible.

Party strategists fear that dissatisfaction in healthcare may have a disproportionate electoral impact, given that access to medical services is viewed by voters as a non-negotiable expectation rather than a discretionary policy area.

Complaints Surge Through CİMER

Another data point alarming AKP officials is the sharp rise in healthcare-related complaints submitted through CİMER, Turkey’s Presidential Communication Center. According to internal party discussions, the Ministry of Health now ranks among the institutions receiving the highest volume of citizen complaints.

AKP insiders interpret this not as routine criticism, but as evidence of desperation among citizens who feel they have no other channel to resolve their problems. One senior party figure summarized the situation bluntly:

“The ministry is closed off to citizens. There is no communication, neither on the ground nor at the desk. People cannot find anyone to listen to their problems.”

The perception that the health bureaucracy has become inaccessible is seen as particularly damaging in a system that emphasizes centralized control and presidential oversight.

Controversial SMS Messages Backfire

Among the most criticized recent initiatives are automated SMS messages sent to patients after treatment in public hospitals, informing them how much the state supposedly paid for their care. The messages typically state: “Our state has paid X amount on your behalf.”

Rather than boosting appreciation for public services, AKP insiders say the practice has angered patients and undermined trust. Party officials argue that the messaging appears tone-deaf amid widespread complaints about service quality.

“These messages irritate citizens and cost us votes,” one assessment states. “The state cannot use this kind of language when it comes to healthcare.”

Others warn that the practice contradicts the principles of a social welfare state:

“In a social state governed by law, the state pays for healthcare as a right. Reminding citizens of the cost and implying ‘look how much we spent on you’ damages the dignity of public service and the reputation of the state.”

Cabinet Reshuffle Debate Intensifies

The growing controversy coincides with speculation about a potential cabinet reshuffle. While changes in several ministries are being discussed publicly, the absence of the Health Ministry from reshuffle rumors has reportedly unsettled many within the AKP.

Party insiders question why healthcare—seen internally as the most problematic policy area on the ground—has not been openly included in discussions of ministerial change.

“The ministry with the most visible problems is health,” one AKP official reportedly said. “Yet its name does not come up in cabinet revision talks. This contradiction is being questioned inside the party as well.”

The concern reflects broader anxiety that the leadership may be underestimating the electoral damage associated with healthcare dissatisfaction.

From Electoral Asset to Warning Signal

Veteran AKP figures reportedly recall that healthcare reforms were once among the party’s most powerful campaign arguments. Investments in hospitals, insurance coverage, and access to care played a major role in consolidating voter support during the party’s first decade in power.

Today, insiders warn that this advantage has evaporated—and may even have reversed. Internal discussions describe the current situation as an “alarm bell,” emphasizing that healthcare remains a red line for voters.

“Healthcare reforms won elections for years,” one assessment concludes. “Now voters are in open revolt. This is a warning. Healthcare is the voter’s red line. If you lose this, you lose the ballot box.”

As economic pressures, staffing shortages, and rising public expectations converge, AKP officials privately acknowledge that the health system may pose one of the most serious political challenges facing the government in the period ahead.

PA Turkey intends to inform Turkey watchers with diverse views and opinions. Articles on our website may not necessarily represent the view of our editorial board or count as endorsement.

Follow our English YouTube channel (REAL TURKEY): https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKpFJB4GFiNkhmpVZQ_d9Rg
Twitter: @AtillaEng
Facebook: Real Turkey Channel: https://www.facebook.com/realturkeychannel/